Blog

Changing the criteria

I decided to monkey around with the criteria, asking myself: what if I just used transit ridership (or more broadly, non-auto commuting) without using the poverty rate as a factor?  Does that change my rankings?

In particular, I created grades as follows: over 60 percent non-auto (defined as “transit plus walking” since the Census doesn’t ask about bikes) = A, 50-60 percent = A-, 40-50= B+, 30-40 = B, 25-30 = B- , 20-25 = C+, 15-20= C, 10-15=C-, 7-10= D+, 5-7=D, 3-5=D-, below 3=F.

I do not think any city’s grade changed by more than a point and a half.  However, some cities were so closely bunched together that it mattered.

In the “cost of living weighed as 30 percent” category, Seattle and Minneapolis were still the leaders- Seattle winning with 84, Minneapolis a close second at 83.5.  Salt Lake City was third at 83, and then Providence, St Paul, Pittsburgh, Rochester and Denver were all pretty closely bunched together.  Birmingham continued to be dead last, with Miami and New Orleans being the only other cities below 75.

In the “ignore cost of living” category, the changed rankings put NYC ahead of SF (90.4 to 89.5), then Boston (87.6), Seattle (86), Minneapolis (84).  Birmingham was again last, with St.Louis, Indianapolis, New Orleans, Kansas City and Nashville all pretty closely bunched together.

Advertisements

links

My scholarship:

new book on sprawl here.

Most of my law review articles here.

My old “Car-Free In” webpages (from when I was wandering around the nation):

My Car-Free in Kansas City page (last updated 2015)

My Car-Free in Jacksonville page (last updated 2011)

My Car-Free in Atlanta page (last updated 2005)

My Car-Free in Buffalo page (last updated 2000 or so)

My Car-Free in Cleveland page (last updated 1997 or so)